|
||||
|
||||
Microfinance GamesXavier GinéWorld Bank - Development Economics Research Group and Bureau for Research and Economic Analysis of Development (BREAD) Pamela JakielaUniversity of Maryland Dean S. KarlanYale University Jonathan MorduchNew York University (NYU) - Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service; New York University (NYU) - Department of Economics July 1, 2006 World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3959 Abstract: Microfinance has been heralded as an effective way to address imperfections in credit markets. But from a theoretical perspective, the success of microfinance contracts has puzzling elements. In particular, the group-based mechanisms often employed are vulnerable to free-riding and collusion, although they can also reduce moral hazard and improve selection. The authors created an experimental economics laboratory in a large urban market in Lima, Peru and over seven months conducted 11 different games that allow them to unpack microfinance mechanisms in a systematic way. They find that risk-taking broadly conforms to predicted patterns, but that behavior is safer than optimal. The results help to explain why pioneering microfinance institutions have been moving away from group-based contracts.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46 Keywords: Banks&Banking Reform, Insurance&Risk Mitigation, Financial Intermediation, Social Accountability, Civic Participation and Corporate Governance working papers seriesDate posted: November 21, 2006Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.485 seconds