|
||||
|
||||
Board Classification and Managerial Entrenchment: Evidence from the Market for Corporate ControlDavid A. BecherDrexel University - Department of Finance Thomas W. BatesArizona State University - Department of Finance Michael L. LemmonUniversity of Utah - Department of Finance September 2007 HKUST Business School Research Paper No. 07-05 Abstract: This paper considers the relation between board classification, takeover activity, and transaction outcomes for a panel of firms between 1990 and 2002. Target board classification does not change the likelihood that a firm, once targeted, is ultimately acquired. Moreover, shareholders of targets with a classified board realize bid returns that are equivalent to those of targets with a single class of directors, but receive a higher proportion of total bid surplus. Board classification does reduce the likelihood of receiving a takeover bid, however, the economic effect of bid deterrence on the value of the firm is quite small. Overall, the evidence is inconsistent with the conventional wisdom that board classification is an anti-takeover device that facilitates managerial entrenchment.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45 Keywords: Classified Board, Staggered Board, Merger, Acquisition, Managerial Entrenchment JEL Classification: G34 working papers seriesDate posted: August 10, 2006 ; Last revised: October 22, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.375 seconds