Sidestepping Lassiter on the Path to Civil Gideon: Civil Douglas
Steven D. Schwinn
John Marshall Law School (Chicago)
Clearinghouse Review, Vol. 40, No. 3-4, pp. 217-222, July-August 2006
U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2006-25
Civil Gideon advocates have at each turn faced the scourge of Lassiter v. Dep't of Social Services, which established (apparently out of whole cloth) a presumption that indigent litigants are entitled to appointed counsel only when physical liberty is at stake. This article proposes side-stepping that presumption by seeking a right to counsel on appeal via Douglas v. California, not a right to counsel at trial via Gideon v. Wainwright. Once established, a civil right to counsel on appeal would presage the inevitable downfall of Lassiter and the establishment of Civil Gideon. This article poses the argument in federal constitutional terms not to support arguments in the federal courts (where recognition of a categorical civil right to counsel is unlikely), but rather to support arguments under state constitutions, which follow - and which are often more flexible than - the federal constitution.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 7
Keywords: Right to counsel, Gideon, Douglas, LassiterAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 12, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds