|
||||
|
||||
The Burden of Network Neutrality Mandates on Rural Broadband DeploymentGeorge S. FordPhoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies Thomas KoutskyConnected Nation Inc. Lawrence J. SpiwakPhoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies July 2006 Phoenix Center Policy Paper No. 25 Abstract: The purpose of this Policy Paper is to examine empirically the relative impact that a regulatory mandate like network neutrality would have on high-cost areas and to compare that relative burden to lower-cost urban areas. We find areas that are, on average, high-cost could be disproportionately affected by imposition of these mandates, even if the cost of complying with that mandate does not vary by geography. Using publicly available network cost models and data, we show that under plausible conditions, while network neutrality mandates negatively impact broadband deployment in all geographic areas regardless of average cost characteristics, such rules could disproportionately impact broadband deployment in high-cost areas. Moreover, our analysis that suggests the differential reduction in service availability for high-cost rural areas is six times as much as in lower cost, more urbanized markets.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20 Keywords: Network Neutrality, stupid network, rural broadband JEL Classification: K20, K23, L10, L50, L51, L52, L96, L98 working papers seriesDate posted: August 22, 2006Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.406 seconds