Martha Stewart Saved! Insider Violations of Rule 10b-5 for Misrepresented or Undisclosed Personal Facts
Joan MacLeod Heminway
University of Tennessee College of Law
Maryland Law Review, Vol. 65, 2006
This article analyses the criminal securities fraud charges brought against Martha Stewart. Stewart was acquitted of these charges by a federal district court judge in February 2004. Specifically, the article initially focuses on whether the securities fraud charges brought against Stewart were valid as a matter of prosecutorial discretion and substantive law and whether the court was correct in granting Stewart's motion for acquittal before handing the rest of her case to the jury for deliberation. The article then offers substantive and procedural observations about Rule 10b-5 cases like the one brought against Stewart.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 53
Keywords: Martha Stewart, Section 10(b), Rule 10b-5, securities fraud, Rule 29, prosecutorial discretion
JEL Classification: K14, K22, K41, K42Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 24, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds