SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Swallows as it Might Have Been: Regulations Revising Case Law

Steve R. Johnson
William S. Boyd School of Law, UNLV



Tax Notes, Vol. 112, No. 9, August 28, 2006

Abstract:     
In Swallows Holding Ltd. v. Commissioner, the Tax Court invalidated a general-authority regulation under section 7805 of the Internal Revenue Code involving return filing by some foreign corporations. A previous article by the author, "Swallows Holding as It Is: The Distortion of National Muffler," maintained that the regulation is consistent with prior case law and should be upheld under the National Muffler standard of deference. This article uses Swallows to explore Chevron and Brand X issues as to interpretive tax regulations generally. It maintains that Chevron typically should apply to challenges to those regulations (and specifically should apply to the challenge to the Swallows regulation) and Brand X should apply when tax regulations revise prior case law rules.

Keywords: Tax regulations

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: August 25, 2006 ; Last revised: October 30, 2008

Suggested Citation

Johnson, Steve R., Swallows as it Might Have Been: Regulations Revising Case Law (August 28, 2006). Tax Notes, Vol. 112, No. 9, August 28, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=926553


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Steve R. Johnson (Contact Author)
William S. Boyd School of Law, UNLV ( email )
4505 South Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States
702-895-4990 (Phone)
702-895-2482 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 261
Downloads: 12

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.094 seconds.