Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=926720
 


 



Singapore, 'Shared Values' and Law: Non East Versus West Constitutional Hermeneutic


Benedict Sheehy


RMIT University


Hong Kong Law Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, p. 67, 2004

Abstract:     
This article examines the apparent contradictions in Singaporean interpretation and application of its Westminster modeled Constitution in which the Constitution is treated as any other piece of legislation and Western style individual rights are easily overrun. It also examines the Government's particularist claim to Asian values as an explanation for its handling of the Constitution and seeks an alternative approach to understand the Constitution with reference to the Government publication, the Shared Values. The author suggests that this Document serves as a quasi-Constitution, and finds that interpreting two leading cases with this hermeneutic leads to a more satisfactory understanding of the court's decisions. The article concludes that the Government's approach toward the law to create the society it envisioned and published in the Document is a different and pragmatic issue, rather than a result of any fundamental East versus West cultural difference.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 29, 2006 ; Last revised: June 25, 2012

Suggested Citation

Sheehy, Benedict, Singapore, 'Shared Values' and Law: Non East Versus West Constitutional Hermeneutic. Hong Kong Law Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, p. 67, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=926720

Contact Information

Benedict Sheehy (Contact Author)
RMIT University ( email )
124 La Trobe Street
Melbourne, Victoria 3000
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 592
Downloads: 30

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.266 seconds