Domestic Violence Matters: The Case for Appointed Counsel in Protective Order Proceedings
University of Minnesota Law School
Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review, Forthcoming
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-38
A conventional reading of United States Supreme Court rulings on the right to counsel in civil cases would conclude that petitioners in protective order proceedings would have no right to appointed counsel. This article challenges this view and shows how Supreme Court jurisprudence, in fact, supports the conclusion that due process requires victims of domestic violence to have the benefit of appointed counsel.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 63
Keywords: domestic violence, right to counselAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 1, 2006
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.922 seconds