Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (8)



 


 



Being Specific About Race-Specific Medicine


Jonathan D. Kahn


Hamline University School of Law

Pamela Sankar


University of Pennsylvania - School of Medicine


Health Affairs, Vol. 25, 2006

Abstract:     
This article is a response to Gary Puckrein's paper "BiDil: From Another Vantage Point," which misrepresents rather than refutes our previously published analysis of BiDil. Puckrein claims that if our analysis were to prevail, patients would be denied life-saving therapy. Any reasonable reading of our paper suggests exactly the opposite. Indeed, based on the evidence, we urge doctors to prescribe the generics or BiDil itself as they see fit, but without regard to the race of their patient.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 3

Keywords: Business of Health, Consumer Issues, Demography, Ethical Issues, Legal/Regulatory Issues, Minority Health, Pharmaceuticals

JEL Classification: D40, I11, I18, K10, K23, L65

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 30, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Kahn, Jonathan D. and Sankar, Pamela, Being Specific About Race-Specific Medicine. Health Affairs, Vol. 25, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=927441

Contact Information

Jonathan D. Kahn (Contact Author)
Hamline University School of Law ( email )
1536 Hewitt Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104-1237
United States
651-523-2648 (Phone)
Pamela Sankar
University of Pennsylvania - School of Medicine ( email )
423 Guardian Drive
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 589
Downloads: 136
Download Rank: 106,468
Footnotes:  8

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.344 seconds