Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=927771
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (162)



 


 



Striking Out 'Competitive Balance' in Sports, Antitrust and Intellectual Property


Salil K. Mehra


Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law

T. Joel Zuercher


Pepper Hamilton LLP


Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Fall 2006
Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 28

Abstract:     
Professional sports leagues enjoy a unique justification in defending their seemingly anticompetitive practices under the antitrust laws: They allegedly need to maintain competitive balance. According to the argument, sports leagues need to do anticompetitive things to enhance their competitive standing vis-a-vis other sports leagues or other forms of entertainment. The argument is on the leading side of a circuit split, with only the D.C. Circuit rejecting it. Additionally, sports leagues have been adept at getting this argument into public discourse and legislative consideration.

This Article argues that antitrust should reject the competitive balance argument on its face. The competitive balance argument makes the assumptions that there can only be one championship competition per sports league, that leagues can and will engineer balance in that unique competition, and that fan interest is directly related to that singular competition. This Article draws on comparative data and recent economic research to conclude that each of these assumptions is wrong and that judicial endorsement of the competitive balance argument may simply be an aesthetic preference without empirical support. Instead, a solution lies in reconceiving the league competition envisioned by the competitive balance argument. In particular, a sports league can be subject to several different "competing competitions" among its constituent teams; it could thus maintain fan interest even in the absence of competitive balance. This view draws support from the experience of the decade-old English Premier League and also helps to illuminate Major League Baseball's litigation attempting to expand its intellectual property rights to limit fantasy baseball league operators.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 74

Keywords: antitrust, sports, intellectual property, competitive balance, sports economics

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 1, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Mehra, Salil K. and Zuercher, T. Joel, Striking Out 'Competitive Balance' in Sports, Antitrust and Intellectual Property. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Fall 2006; Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 28. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=927771

Contact Information

Salil K. Mehra (Contact Author)
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law ( email )
1719 North Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States
215-204-7113 (Phone)
215-204-1185 (Fax)
T. Joel Zuercher
Pepper Hamilton LLP ( email )
3000 Two Logan Square
Eighteenth and Arch Streets
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2799
United States
215-981-4916 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.pepperlaw.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,609
Downloads: 432
Download Rank: 35,133
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  162

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.422 seconds