The Law of Typicality: Examining the Procedural Due Process Implications of Sandin v. Conner

Donna H. Lee

CUNY School of Law

Fordham Law Review, Vol. 72, p. 785, 2004

Although the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has long protected against deprivations that implicate state-created liberty interests as well as core constitutional concerns, the Supreme Court changed course in liberty interest jurisprudence in Sandin v. Conner. It retreated from a positivist approach and articulated a new test for determining when a prisoner's claim warrants procedural due process. The Court held that the challenged action must impose an atypical and significant hardship, but provided little guidance on how to measure typicality and significance. This Article proposes a methodology for examining typicality that is grounded in empirical evidence and advocates a balancing test that weighs typicality based on actual state practices, significance as a de minimis threshold, and state positive law as an evidentiary tool in determining whether a liberty interest is at stake. In contrast to the actual approaches taken by the lower courts interpreting Sandin, this proposal has the benefit of promoting consistency, integrity, and coherence in the development of the law regarding state-created liberty interests.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 64

Keywords: prisoner, due process, liberty interest

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: September 2, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Lee, Donna H., The Law of Typicality: Examining the Procedural Due Process Implications of Sandin v. Conner. Fordham Law Review, Vol. 72, p. 785, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=927803

Contact Information

Donna H. Lee (Contact Author)
CUNY School of Law ( email )
2 Court Square
Long Island City, NY 11101
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 278
Downloads: 33

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.406 seconds