|
||||
|
||||
It's Congress's War, Too
Kenneth Anderson Washington College of Law, American University; Stanford University - The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace IDEA LAB: IT'S CONGRESS'S WAR, TOO, New York Times Magazine, September 3, 2006 Abstract: Regardless of whether one believes that the war on terror should be an aggressive, forward-based, offensive war as the Bush administration does, or instead something not conceived as a war at all, as many Democrats do, it is long since time for Congress to take steps to legislate US counterterrorism policy. Only the people's representatives - the legislature - have the democratic legitimacy to establish long term counterterrorism policy. What would comprehensive counterterrorism policy look like? The issues that matter most are not technocratic ones of institutional design, important as those are - but instead values issues, America's values in the struggle against jihadist terror. They include surveillance, detention and rendition, interrogation and torture, classification of information, and the establishment of special terrorism courts. The Bush administration should mark well that what lives by executive discretion dies by executive discretion, and if the war on terror is as important as it thinks it is, it should be willing to institutionalize it through legislation.
Keywords: terror, war on terror, September 11, surveillance, FISA, interrogation, Guantanamo, torture, detention, laws of war, classified information, terrorism courts JEL Classifications: K10, K33 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 04, 2006 ; Last revised: December 02, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.125 seconds.