Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=929396
 
 

Footnotes (161)



 


 



Majority Jury Verdicts and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms


Peter Sankoff


University of Alberta - Faculty of Law


University of British Columbia Law Review, Vol. 39, pp. 333-369, 2006

Abstract:     
Canada will soon be the last nation in the world to require unanimous jury verdicts for every criminal trial held within the country. Even in Australia and the United States, where unanimous verdicts are preferred, there are jurisdictions where majority verdicts are permitted. Given this unique status, it is perhaps only a matter of time before Canada revisits its decision to require unanimous verdicts in all criminal jury trials. Certainly, calls for such a move are not unheard of, and over the years cries for reform have come sporadically from members of the public, the press and politicians. Still, any move to transform Canada's requirement for unanimous verdicts will not be a decision rooted solely in policy. Any alteration of this nature is likely to run into stiff opposition and, inevitably, a challenge under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Section 11(d) of the Charter requires that the defendant be presumed innocent until proven guilty. Section 11(f) guarantees the right to the benefit of trial by jury. Both of these sections are likely to be implicated by any proposal to eliminate the unanimous jury requirement.

In this article I propose to examine the Charter implications of altering Canada's current requirement for unanimous jury verdicts. Given the absence of jurisprudence directly on point, it is difficult to reach firm conclusions about the constitutionality of such a proposal. Nonetheless, there is good reason to believe that any attempt to move to majority verdicts would infringe s. 11(f) or s. 7 of the Charter, though s. 11(d) is not likely to be violated. Consequently, the constitutionality of such a measure would depend upon there being a sufficient s.1 justification for the change — a task that would be assisted considerably by the fact that so many similar regimes exist in free and democratic societies around the world.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: Juries, Jury, Charter, Constitution, Constitutional, Reasonable Limits, Fair Trial, Majority Verdict

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 12, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Sankoff, Peter, Majority Jury Verdicts and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. University of British Columbia Law Review, Vol. 39, pp. 333-369, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=929396

Contact Information

Peter Sankoff (Contact Author)
University of Alberta - Faculty of Law ( email )
Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H5
Canada
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,605
Downloads: 146
Download Rank: 116,051
Footnotes:  161

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.235 seconds