Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=929562
 
 

Footnotes (51)



 


 



What are We Comparing in Comparative Negligence?


Paul H. Edelman


Vanderbilt University - Law School


Washington University Law Review, Vol. 85, 2007
Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 06-20

Abstract:     
In tort cases, comparative negligence now is the dominant method for determining damages. Under that method, the jury apportions fault among the parties and assesses damages in proportion to the relative fault assessment. Comparative negligence contrasts with contributory negligence, where any fault attributed to the plaintiff bars recovery.

Although comparative negligence routinely governs in tort cases, its most basic feature remains uncertain: how to apportion fault. In this Article, I demonstrate that at least two different methods exist, and that these methods lead to radically different outcomes. I create a framework, building on a traditional model from law and economics, to determine when each applies. I argue that the applicable method varies with the nature of care and the relationship between care and expected damage. This framework will organize and reshape comparative negligence determination.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 17, 2006 ; Last revised: October 20, 2007

Suggested Citation

Edelman, Paul H., What are We Comparing in Comparative Negligence?. Washington University Law Review, Vol. 85, 2007; Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 06-20. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=929562 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.929562

Contact Information

Paul H. Edelman (Contact Author)
Vanderbilt University - Law School ( email )
131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States
615-322-0990 (Phone)
615-322-6631 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,389
Downloads: 206
Download Rank: 88,620
Footnotes:  51

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.282 seconds