|
||||
|
||||
Trademark Law and Status Signaling: Tattoos for the PrivilegedJeffrey Lynch HarrisonUniversity of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law January 10, 2007 Florida Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 3, 2007 Abstract: The principal function of trademarks is to lower consumer confusion and, consequently, search costs. For example, a traveler knows certain things without further inquiry if he or she sees a Ritz-Carlton, a Holiday Inn, or even a McDonalds sign along the highway. In these instances, there is communication from the owner of the mark to potential customers. Trademarks are also used as a means for individuals to communicate information about themselves to others. Very typically, the signaling relates to status or wealth. Courts have held that this function of trademarks is something the law should advance. This Article makes the case that there appear to be little or no economic or moral bases for a public policy of supporting the efforts of the privileged to advertise, signal, or communicate their status to others.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23 Keywords: trademark, economics, veblen, pareto JEL Classification: K11, K29, D61 working papers seriesDate posted: September 17, 2006 ; Last revised: November 27, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.578 seconds