Was Electricity a General Purpose Technology?
Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Harvard University - Entrepreneurial Management Unit
The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol.94, No. 2, pp. 388-394. May 2004
This paper uses historical patent citation data to test whether electricity, as the canonical example of a General Purpose Technology (GPT), matches the current citations-based criteria of GPTs. We use a sample of 1,867 American patents assigned to publicly traded companies in the 1920s and 3,400 forward citations to these patents to check which of four industry categories - electricity, chemicals, mechanical and other - most closely matches the key elements of GPTs. Our results suggest that electricity patents were broader in scope than other categories of patents at their grant date, and that they were more "original" than their counterparts. However, we also show that electricity patents had lower generality scores, fewer citations per patent (a measure of technological importance), and shorter citation lags (i.e., faster rates of knowledge depreciation). We argue that technological change, even in the 1920's, was much broader than has previously been considered.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16
Keywords: Innovation, Patents, General Purpose Technology, U.S. Economic History
JEL Classification: N00, O30, O31, O34
Date posted: September 18, 2006
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.563 seconds