Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=930663
 
 

References (15)



 


 



Volume, Opinion Divergence and Book-to-Market Anomaly


Sebahattin Demirkan


University of Maryland - Robert H. Smith School of Business

Aug 1, 2012

Journal of Knowledge Globalization, 5(1), 29-45

Abstract:     
Ali et al (2003) finding about the mispricing explanation on B/M anomaly is replicated by including risk compensation explanation. The proxy for opinion divergence in this study is unexpected volume which is also used by Garfinkel and Sokobin (2006). The finding supported investors’ treatment of unexpected volume proxies opinion divergence as an additional risk that requires ex post compensation. I documented that B/M effect increases with the opinion divergence. I also directly test Varian (1985) argument empirically and provide support for the compensation for risk to the B/M-based portfolio returns as suggested by Fama and French (1992, 1993, 1997).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: Opinion Divergence, Arbitrage risk, Book-to-market

JEL Classification: G11, G14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 15, 2006 ; Last revised: September 10, 2012

Suggested Citation

Demirkan, Sebahattin, Volume, Opinion Divergence and Book-to-Market Anomaly (Aug 1, 2012). Journal of Knowledge Globalization, 5(1), 29-45. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=930663

Contact Information

Sebahattin Demirkan (Contact Author)
University of Maryland - Robert H. Smith School of Business ( email )
College Park, MD 20742-1815
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 352
Downloads: 55
Download Rank: 219,711
References:  15

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.219 seconds