Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (191)



 


 



Evolving Objective Standards: A Developmental Approach to Constitutional Review of Morals Legislation


Christian J. Grostic


University of Michigan


Michigan Law Review, Vol. 105, p. 151, October 2006

Abstract:     
Many scholars have attempted to describe what they see as the proper role of moral judgment in adjudication and constitutional interpretation. Conspicuously missing from this discussion, however, is empirical research about moral and psychological development. Courts and scholars alike have spoken of evolving or developing standards, but rarely do they invoke the findings of psychologists and social researchers who make a career studying evolving and developing standards and abilities. This Note aims to begin filling that void.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: morals, legislation, constitution, integral, wilber, kohlberg, development, spiral dynamics, equal protection, due process

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 19, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Grostic, Christian J., Evolving Objective Standards: A Developmental Approach to Constitutional Review of Morals Legislation. Michigan Law Review, Vol. 105, p. 151, October 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=930865

Contact Information

Christian J. Grostic (Contact Author)
University of Michigan ( email )
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,093
Downloads: 111
Download Rank: 125,533
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  191

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.578 seconds