Norms and Enforcement: The Case Against Copyright Litigation
University of California Hastings College of Law; Ugent - CASLE; Stanford CIS
Ghent University-Universiteit Gent - Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology
Oregon Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 4, p. 1127, 2006
Drawing on socio-psychological literature and new data from an empirical study, this Article posits that copyright litigation faces an impossibility theorem: lawsuits against file sharers cannot simultaneously achieve effective deterrence and promote pro-copyright norms. Anti-copyright norms of file swappers are strengthened when the level of copyright enforcement increases, which results in more downloading whenever enforcement is temporarily suspended. Enforcement has an ambivalent effect on individuals who have no experience with file sharing. Severe sanctions do not have a counterproductive effect on copyright norms of such non-file sharers, yet exposure to information on copyright enforcement reinforces the expectation that others are downloading.
The Article reflects on the lessons learned from the study, in particular with regard to the policy choices that regulators, courts, and copyright-dependent industries face when approaching the widespread use of copyrighted material on file-sharing networks. These options, including criminal prosecutions of digital piracy, copyright education, self-help strategies, and collective licensing, are evaluated in light of the interaction of deterrence and anti-copyright norms.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 54
Keywords: copyright law, litigation, P2P, file sharing
JEL Classification: K10, K11, K42, D70
Date posted: September 20, 2006 ; Last revised: November 12, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds