Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=931622
 


 



Non-Representational Jurisprudence: A Centennial Reading of the 'Path of the Law'


Robert E. Rodes Jr.


Notre Dame Law School


American Journal of Jurisprudence, Vol. 42, 1997
Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 06-22

Abstract:     
This paper analyzes particular passages in Holmes's famous lecture, and notes important inconsistencies and failings in his approach. After arguing strongly that moral considerations should not enter into legal judgments, he criticizes legal judgments in the light of moral considerations. After defining law as a prediction of what the courts will do, he seems to criticize courts for getting the law wrong in their decisions. His advice to learn the legal profession by studying law from the standpoint of a bad man leaves out of account the numerous potential clients who wish to be law abiding citizens and to seal with their associates in accordance with law. The paper recognizes the importance of Holmes's contribution, but suggests regarding it as a set of fragmented views from different standpoints rather than a coherent view of the whole legal system.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 20, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Rodes, Robert E., Non-Representational Jurisprudence: A Centennial Reading of the 'Path of the Law'. American Journal of Jurisprudence, Vol. 42, 1997; Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 06-22. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=931622

Contact Information

Robert E. Rodes Jr. (Contact Author)
Notre Dame Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 400
Downloads: 29

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.532 seconds