On Clandestine Warfare
Robert E. Rodes Jr.
Notre Dame Law School
Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 39, 1982
Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 06-27
Common moral judgments on many types of clandestine warfare, referred to by some as terrorism, seem to be more nuanced and less severe than our current legal judgments. This paper begins by offering a detailed typology of clandestine operations and measures to combat them, a few general reflections on the laws of war, and a critique of those laws as they now stand. It then proposes a substantial revision of the laws which govern clandestine warfare based on four basic principles of the laws and the morality of just war: the independence of jus in bello from the jus ad bellum; the condemnation of perfidy; the immunity of noncombatants from attack; and quarter for lawful combatants when captured. With these four basic principles in mind, the paper concludes with a model "International Draft Convention on Clandestine Warfare" and a model "Draft Federal Act Concerning Armed Organizations".
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 20, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds