Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=932059
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Unfunded Mandate: An Empirical Study of the Implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission


Kathryn Moss


University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research

Scott Burris


Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law

Michael Darren Ullman


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Matthew Johnsen


University of Massachusetts at Worcester - University of Massachusetts Medical School

Jeffrey W. Swanson


Duke University - Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences


Kansas Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2001

Abstract:     
In the decade following its passage, more than 200,000 employment discrimination complaints were filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This Article presents the findings of an empirical investigation of the implementation of the ADA by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and state and local fair employment practices agencies (FEPAs). Although not as well-covered in the press as ADA litigation, or as debated in the law reviews, these administrative agencies dispose of the vast majority of ADA employment discrimination cases, which must be filed with the agency as a precondition to any later court litigation. Because the EEOC also administers other basic federal antidiscrimination statutes B including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Equal Pay Act, and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 B our findings shed important light on the entire enterprise of the enforcement of federal employment discrimination legislation.

The article proceeds as follows. Part II is a brief history of the EEOC, describing the transformation of the agency from its creation in 1964 to the present. Our sources of data, and their major limitations, are described in Part III. We provide a basic statistical portrait of the ADA work of the EEOC and FEPAs in Part IV. In Part V, we discuss the factors that are influencing the outcomes of the EEOC process, using a model drawn from policy implementation studies and the results of statistical analyses of our data.

Congress passed the ADA with grand promises about the employment of people with disabilities. We conclude that the EEOC simply cannot keep those promises without the resources to do a reasonable investigation of every charge that is not obviously groundless. The ultimate responsibility, and the onus for action, lie on Congress, which has given the EEOC a broad mandate to process employment cases and enforce fair employment laws without ever giving it the resources it would need to do the job properly. Simple fairness to workers and employers alike requires that Congress give the EEOC enough money to properly investigate its charges. Short of that, Congress needs to change the procedures under the Civil Rights Act to allow individuals to drop out of the administrative process sooner, or bypass it altogether.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 110

Keywords: Disability, Discrimination, Implementation, ADA, Law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 27, 2006 ; Last revised: July 21, 2009

Suggested Citation

Moss, Kathryn and Burris, Scott and Ullman, Michael Darren and Johnsen, Matthew and Swanson, Jeffrey W., Unfunded Mandate: An Empirical Study of the Implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Kansas Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=932059

Contact Information

Kathryn Moss
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research ( email )
725 Airport Road, CB# 7590
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590
United States
919-966-0601 (Phone)
919-966-3811 (Fax)
Scott C. Burris (Contact Author)
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law ( email )
1719 N. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States
215-204-6576 (Phone)
215-204-1185 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.temple.edu/lawschool/phrhcs/index.html
Michael Darren Ullman
affiliation not provided to SSRN
No Address Available
Matthew Johnsen
University of Massachusetts at Worcester - University of Massachusetts Medical School
55 Lake Avenue North
Worcester, MA 01655
United States
Jeffrey W. Swanson
Duke University - Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences ( email )
Durham, NC 27715
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,428
Downloads: 147
Download Rank: 115,303
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.515 seconds