Concordance & Conflict in Intuitions of Justice
Paul H. Robinson
University of Pennsylvania Law School
University of Pennsylvania - Department of Psychology
University of Pennsylvania Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 06-38
Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 91, No. 6, 2007
The common wisdom among criminal law theorists and policy makers is that the notion of desert is vague and the subject to wide disagreement. Yet the empirical evidence in available studies, including new studies reported here, paints a dramatically different picture. While moral philosophers may disagree on some aspects of moral blameworthiness, people's intuitions of justice are commonly specific, nuanced, and widely shared. Indeed, with regard to the core harms and evils to which criminal law addresses itself - physical aggression, takings without consent, and deception in transactions - people's shared intuitions cut across demographics and cultures. The findings raise interesting questions - such as, what could explain this striking result? - and hint at intriguing implications for criminal law and criminal justice policy.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 80
Keywords: desert, blame, empirical studies, moral philosophy, intuitions, psychology, criminal justice policy, criminal law
JEL Classification: K14Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 22, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.563 seconds