Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=933013
 


 



The Headnote


Daniel A. Farber


University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

Gil Grantmore


University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law


Green Bag, Vol. 5, No. 2d, 2002
UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 933013

Abstract:     
Every Supreme Court opinion is prefaced by a curiously self-contradictory citation. The Syllabus is accompanied by a footnote warning of the Syllabus's unofficial status. By the same token, of course, the footnote itself is unofficial and has no legal standing. This essay reexamines the status of the Syllabus, and argues that it should have precedential authority.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: headnote, abstract, Supreme Court, reporter, decisions, Detroit Lumber, Detroit Timber, United States Reports, clerks, Balkin, footnote

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 27, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Farber, Daniel A. and Grantmore, Gil, The Headnote. Green Bag, Vol. 5, No. 2d, 2002; UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 933013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=933013

Contact Information

Daniel A. Farber (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
Boalt Hall
Room 894
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
510-642-0340 (Phone)
510-642-3728 (Fax)
Gil Grantmore
University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law ( email )
Wilson W. Wyatt Hall
Louisville, KY 40292
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 875
Downloads: 159
Download Rank: 112,893

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.485 seconds