Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=934380
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Piercing Pareto Superiority: Real People and the Obligations of Legal Theory


Jeffrey Lynch Harrison


University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law


Arizona Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
This essay has two purposes. The first is to demonstrate that the appearance of mutual assent and Pareto Superiority are weak bases for enforcing agreements. Pareto Superiority, as unassailable as it may seem, is paper-thin and frequently based on illusions and a normatively meaningless assessment of what it means to be better off. The approach here is one of piercing Pareto Superiority in order to examine the human factors that may determine whether an agreement occurs and its distributive consequences. Relative deprivation is the instrument used. The second purpose is to suggest that it is the obligation of legal theory to take greater account of the psychological and social factors that influence the process of agreement.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: Pareto, deprivation, assent

JEL Classification: A14, B25, D63, K29

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 3, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Harrison, Jeffrey Lynch, Piercing Pareto Superiority: Real People and the Obligations of Legal Theory. Arizona Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=934380

Contact Information

Jeffrey Lynch Harrison (Contact Author)
University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 612
Downloads: 52
Download Rank: 227,814
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.282 seconds