A Crack in the Shield? Malpractice Coverage at Risk
Daniel S. Kleinberger
William Mitchell College of Law
William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 49
Bench and Bar of Minnesota, Vol. 63, p. 26, 2006
A recent, unreported opinion of the Minnesota Court of Appeals has opened up a major hole in the liability shield of professional firms. Continental Casualty Co. v Duckson-Carlson, LLC, misapplies the doctrine of equitable estoppel, misinterprets the Minnesota Professional Firms Act, ignores the fundamental distinction between an entity and its owners, and sub silentio turns the law of third party beneficiaries on its head. From a practical perspective, the decision should trouble every lawyer, doctor, accountant, and other "319B" professional in the state and, moreover, has serious implications for individuals covered by D&O insurance.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 7
Keywords: liability insurance, malpractice, attorney lawyer, professional firm, third party beneficiary, separate legal personAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 8, 2006
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds