|
||||
|
||||
A Crack in the Shield? Malpractice Coverage at RiskDaniel S. KleinbergerWilliam Mitchell College of Law William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 49 Bench and Bar of Minnesota, Vol. 63, p. 26, 2006 Abstract: A recent, unreported opinion of the Minnesota Court of Appeals has opened up a major hole in the liability shield of professional firms. Continental Casualty Co. v Duckson-Carlson, LLC, misapplies the doctrine of equitable estoppel, misinterprets the Minnesota Professional Firms Act, ignores the fundamental distinction between an entity and its owners, and sub silentio turns the law of third party beneficiaries on its head. From a practical perspective, the decision should trouble every lawyer, doctor, accountant, and other "319B" professional in the state and, moreover, has serious implications for individuals covered by D&O insurance.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 7 Keywords: liability insurance, malpractice, attorney lawyer, professional firm, third party beneficiary, separate legal person Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: October 8, 2006Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds