Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=93659
 
 

Citations



 


 



Federal Courts and the Incorporation of International Law


Curtis A. Bradley


Duke University - School of Law

Jack Landman Goldsmith III


Harvard Law School


Harvard Law Review, June 1998

Abstract:     
Many scholars believe that customary international law (CIL) has the status of self-executing federal common law, to be applied by courts in the United States without any need for it to be enacted or implemented by Congress. In an article last year, we argued that this view lacks historical support and is in substantial tension with political branch enactments as well as broader constitutional principles of separation of powers, federalism, and representative democracy. We concluded that CIL should not be treated as federal law in the absence of authorization from the federal political branches. In the May 1998 issue of the Harvard Law Review, Professor Harold Koh argues that our analysis and conclusion are "radical," "utterly mistaken," and "bizarre." In this response to Koh's article, we focus on the four central errors in Koh's analysis: (a) its mistaken use of history; (b) its conflation of the traditional CIL that regulates international relations with the new CIL of human rights that regulates the way a nation treats its citizens; (c) its unjustifiably broad conception of the common law powers of federal courts; and (d) its unwarranted assumption that all of international law must be incorporated into domestic law.

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: May 29, 1998  

Suggested Citation

Bradley, Curtis A. and Goldsmith, Jack Landman, Federal Courts and the Incorporation of International Law. Harvard Law Review, June 1998. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=93659

Contact Information

Curtis A. Bradley (Contact Author)
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Jack Landman Goldsmith III
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,790

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.250 seconds