Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=936672
 
 

Footnotes (39)



 


 



Moving Beyond Zeal in the Rulemaking Process: A Reply to Professor Monroe Freedman


Andrew M. Perlman


Suffolk University Law School


George Mason Law Review, Vol. 14, 2006

Abstract:     
Professor Freedman has written a Response to my recent article on ethics issues associated with the inadvertent disclosure of privilege documents. In that Response, http://ssrn.com/abstract=923587, Professor Freedman reviews the many reasons that lawyers should pursue a client's cause with zeal, and he explains how those reasons apply to the difficult problem of misdirected privileged documents. He concludes that, unless clients specify otherwise after getting advice from counsel, lawyers should always take advantage of an opponent's inadvertent disclosures.

In this Reply, I contend that Professor Freedman's proposed rule places too much emphasis on zealous advocacy. The problem is that Professor Freedman assumes that if lawyers should act zealously in the event of ambiguous ethics rules, we should also want rulemakers to focus heavily on zeal when crafting the rule regarding misdirected documents. In fact, even if we assume that lawyers should resolve any ambiguities in the rules in favor of zeal, we should still want rulemakers to examine a broader range of public policy considerations when crafting the rules themselves. Because Professor Freedman does not discuss this distinction, he does not fully acknowledge several values other than zealous advocacy that we should consider when developing a rule on misdirected documents. Those other values suggest that the rule should require lawyers to return inadvertent disclosures, but only when senders discover their mistakes before recipients have reviewed the relevant documents.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: ethics, professional responsibility, inadvertent disclosures, misdirected documents, attorney-client privilege

JEL Classification: K10, K19

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 15, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Perlman, Andrew M., Moving Beyond Zeal in the Rulemaking Process: A Reply to Professor Monroe Freedman. George Mason Law Review, Vol. 14, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=936672

Contact Information

Andrew Perlman (Contact Author)
Suffolk University Law School ( email )
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States
(617) 573-8777 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 905
Downloads: 49
Footnotes:  39

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.422 seconds