Reconciliation and Non-Repetition: A New Paradigm for African-American Reparations
University of Hawaii at Manoa - William S. Richardson School of Law
U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-35
The contemporary paradigm for African-American reparations fundamentally fails to address what should be its most vital component. Of the three essential elements of a successful reparations campaign - apology, award, and non-repetition through reconciliation - the most vital is non-repetition. In past "successful" reparations campaigns, the offending parties have issued apologies and awards, but have neither challenged nor dismantled the attitudes or infrastructures from which wrongful acts emerged, leaving open the likelihood of wrongful acts occurring again. Any campaign that neglects the non-repetition element runs the risk of strengthening the status quo. In this article, Professor Burkett argues that in order for a reparations campaign to be a true success for African-Americans, it must include a non-repetition element. To do so, the reparations movement must embrace a reconciliation model that is forward-looking and concerned with the methods of deterring future bad acts for ultimate, complete, and successful repair. In the current discourse on African-American reparations, Professor Burkett argues, non-repetition through reconciliation is woefully underemphasized. The incorporation of the non-repetition element is particularly important in the American context. From the nation's earliest days, the American political and economic landscape has evolved in a particularly pernicious manner, creating and entrenching a racial and economic hierarchy that persistently subjugates African-Americans and other of-color and low-income communities. Professor Burkett argues that in this context a multi-racial, multi-ethnic and cross-class reconciliation model is vital to the success of the African-American campaign. This broad-based approach, the author maintains, is the only way to ensure non-repetition.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
JEL Classification: K10working papers series
Date posted: October 11, 2006
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.733 seconds