Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=936771
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (180)



 


 



Learning from Wal-Mart


Melissa Hart


University of Colorado Law School

October 11, 2006

U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-36

Abstract:     
This article considers the landmark gender discrimination class action, Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, both as a prototype of an emerging litigation strategy and also as a case that is entirely unique. As part of a growing trend of gender discrimination class claims, Dukes has the potential to push the boundaries of the law to confront the pervasive, tenacious stereotypes that continue to limit women's workplace opportunities. The plaintiffs' arguments - both the narrative of discrimination their evidence set out and the legal strategies they chose - are strikingly similar to claims that have been made in many class action lawsuits over the past decade. It is a strategy for litigation that challenges both the company-wide policy to delegate pay and promotion decision-making authority and the individual subjective decisions of managers throughout the country. The first challenge - to Wal-Mart's centralized policy choices - puts this case squarely within doctrinal debates about Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 that have dominated class litigation for close to a decade. The second aspect of this litigation - its assault on the subjective decisions made as a consequence of Wal-Mart's delegation - raises a question that has lurked behind Title VII litigation for years: What responsibility should employers take for gender stereotypes and biases that pervade United States culture when the effects of those cultural norms are felt at work? By challenging the aggregate consequences of multiple individual decisions, this article argues, this type of gender discrimination class litigation takes an extremely important step in efforts to root out gender inequalities at work. Finally, the piece considers the ways in which Dukes v. Wal-Mart, although it is part of a trend of similar litigation, has unique importance because the defendant is Wal-Mart, and in particular because of Wal-Mart's extraordinary market power and its consequent influence on other employers' practices, and the company's remarkably strong corporate culture.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: Civil Rights, gender discrimination, Wal-Mart, Women's Rights, Class Action Litigation

JEL Classification: K31, K42

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 12, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Hart, Melissa, Learning from Wal-Mart (October 11, 2006). U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-36. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=936771 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.936771

Contact Information

Melissa Hart (Contact Author)
University of Colorado Law School ( email )
401 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309
United States
303-735-6344 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,725
Downloads: 576
Download Rank: 24,778
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  180

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.265 seconds