Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=936889
 
 

Footnotes (267)



 


 



Treason, Technology, and Freedom of Expression


Tom W. Bell


Chapman University, The Dale E. Fowler School of Law


Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 37, p. 999, 2005

Abstract:     
The power to punish treason against the U.S. conflicts with the First Amendment freedoms of speech and of the press. Far from a question of mere theory, that conflict threatens to chill public dissent to the War on Terrorism. The government has already demonstrated its willingness to punish treasonous expression. After World War II, the United States won several prosecutions against citizens who had engaged in propaganda on behalf of the Axis powers. Today, critics of the War on Terrorism likewise face accusations of treason. Under the law of treasonous expression developed following World War II, those accusations could credibly support prosecutions. Any such prosecutions could win convictions, moreover, unless courts narrow the law of treasonous expression to satisfy the First Amendment. That potential clash between the power to punish treason and our freedoms of expression has, thanks to advances in communications technologies, become a matter of everyday concern.

In terms of abstract doctrine, the law of treason condemns anyone who owes allegiance to the U.S., who adheres to U.S. enemies, and who gives them aid and comfort by an overt act to which two witnesses testify. As courts have applied that doctrine, however, it threatens any citizen or resident of the U.S. who publicly expresses disloyal sentiments. The Internet has made it cheap, easy, and dangerous to publish such sentiments. It hosts many an expression that an eager prosecutor could cite both as proof of adherence to U.S. enemies — a subjective state of mind — and as proof of an overt act giving them aid and comfort — an objective fact to which any two of the expression's readers could testify. Even if no prosecutions for treason arise, the alarmingly broad yet ill-defined reach of the law of treason threatens to unconstitutionally chill innocent dissent. This paper details the scope of the law of treasonous expression, explains why technology threatens to bring that law into conflict with the First Amendment, and suggests a way to safely separate the power to punish treason from our freedoms of expression.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: Treason, technology, freedom of expression, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, First Amendment, blogging

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 12, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Bell, Tom W., Treason, Technology, and Freedom of Expression. Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 37, p. 999, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=936889 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.680694

Contact Information

Tom W. Bell (Contact Author)
Chapman University, The Dale E. Fowler School of Law ( email )
One University Drive
Orange, CA 92866-1099
United States
714-628-2503 (Phone)
714-628-2576 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.tomwbell.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 792
Downloads: 85
Download Rank: 83,943
Footnotes:  267

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.594 seconds