Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=937344
 
 

Footnotes (197)



 


 



Internet Cookies: When is Permission Consent?


Max Stul Oppenheimer


University of Baltimore - School of Law


Nebraska Law Review, November 2006

Abstract:     
Consent is the Philosophers' Stone of the law: it can transmute an unconstitutional search into a lawful one, a criminal act into a legal one, and a tort into a contract. As technology has evolved, so has this fundamental legal concept. New forms of communication call for new forms of manifesting consent. Examples include shrink-wrap licenses, click-to-accept licenses, faxed signatures, emails and e-signatures. Each of these forms, however, require some affirmative action by the person sought to be bound. An emerging issue is whether permissions granted by a computer program can constitute consent on behalf of the computer's owner, particularly where the permissions are set by default in the distributed form of the program rather than by conscious decision of the owner.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: internet, cookies, consent, trespass, electronic trespass, condemnation, search and seizure

JEL Classification: K39

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 15, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Oppenheimer, Max Stul, Internet Cookies: When is Permission Consent?. Nebraska Law Review, November 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=937344

Contact Information

Max Stul Oppenheimer (Contact Author)
University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )
1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,272
Downloads: 277
Download Rank: 62,244
Footnotes:  197

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.219 seconds