Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=937408
 
 

Footnotes (14)



 


 



Homer Simpson Meets the Rule Against Perpetuities: The Controversial Use of Pop-Culture in Legal Writing Pedagogy


Louis N. Schulze Jr.


Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law


Perspectives, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2006

Abstract:     
Imagine that you have returned to your first year of law school. In your legal writing course, you are required to finish the year with an extensive brief analyzing a legal problem. After months in your doctrinal courses dealing with mind-bending legal issues such as liquidated damages, substantive due process, felony murder, personal jurisdiction, and shifting executory interests, you are ready to sink your teeth into a challenging legal writing assignment. You want to show your stuff and prove that your writing is law review caliber. Your assignment starts as follows:

Greenacre is a parcel of land bounded on three of its sides by Redacre. James Green, your client, owns Greenacre. Steve Red owns Redacre. Red and Green have been disputing the rights of Green to maintain a dirt road leading from Greenacre through Redacre, which leads to Highway 109. . . .

Fascinating stuff, no? This problem, while possibly viable as a device for inculcating legal writing skills, could nonetheless use some zest. One way to improve its readability and interest level might be to use familiar or humorous character names from pop-culture.

The claim has been made, however, that the use of such names in legal research and writing ("LRW") pedagogy is inappropriate. The argument is that students should take these assignments seriously, and populating one's writing problem with characters from pop-culture makes it less likely that they will do so.

But is this position truly defensible? Do students really take these assignments less seriously if a challenging legal issue happens to be in an amusing context? On the other hand, are there any justifications for the use of pop-culture references in legal writing pedagogy? If so, does the upside outweigh the downside? This article analyzes the issue whether teachers of legal research and writing should dare to go where our sisters and brothers of the doctrinal faculty have gone for years - into the realm of designing writing assignments using pop-culture references as characters as a means by which to balance doctrinal learning with heightened interest. Put quite simply: does a little sugar indeed help the medicine go down?

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

Keywords: Legal Writing, pedagogy, pop-culture

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 15, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Schulze, Louis N., Homer Simpson Meets the Rule Against Perpetuities: The Controversial Use of Pop-Culture in Legal Writing Pedagogy. Perspectives, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=937408

Contact Information

Louis Schulze Jr. (Contact Author)
Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law ( email )
11200 SW 8th St.
RDB Hall 1097
Miami, FL 33199
United States
305-348-4963 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.fiu.edu/faculty/louis-schulze-jr/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,314
Downloads: 181
Download Rank: 100,249
Footnotes:  14

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.359 seconds