Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=937547
 
 

Footnotes (239)



 


 



The 'Special Needs' of Prison, Probation, and Parole


Antoine McNamara


New York University Law Review


New York University Law Review, Vol. 82, p. 209, 2007

Abstract:     
Although government searches generally must be supported by warrant and probable cause, the Supreme Court rarely has applied this requirement in penal contexts such as prison, probation, and parole. In order to justify the government's broad search authority in those contexts, the Court has created a patchwork of categorical rules and skewed balancing tests based on search targets' diminished expectations of privacy. This Note argues that the Court's current approach is unsound: Broad government search authority is justified in certain penal settings, but only because those settings create compelling government needs, not because the search targets have diminished privacy interests. Penal searches should therefore be analyzed under the "special needs" doctrine, which was designed for just this type of situation--where the government has compelling interests above and beyond those found in typical law enforcement contexts. A special needs analysis would allow courts to address the government's unique interests without devaluing the strong privacy interests at stake. Most importantly, it would impose an additional safeguard to cabin discretion and protect against harassment: Warrantless penal searches could be performed only with individualized suspicion of wrongdoing or through a neutral, nondiscretionary plan.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, prison, probation, parole, search, criminal procedure

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 19, 2006  

Suggested Citation

McNamara, Antoine, The 'Special Needs' of Prison, Probation, and Parole. New York University Law Review, Vol. 82, p. 209, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=937547

Contact Information

Antoine McNamara (Contact Author)
New York University Law Review ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,875
Downloads: 193
Download Rank: 92,453
Footnotes:  239

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds