|
||||
|
||||
Moving the Goalposts: Addressing Limited Overlap in Estimation of Average Treatment Effects by Changing the EstimandRichard K. CrumpFederal Reserve Banks - Federal Reserve Bank of New York V. Joseph HotzDuke University; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Guido W. ImbensUniversity of California, Berkeley - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Oscar A. MitnikUniversity of Miami; Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) September 2006 IZA Discussion Paper No. 2347 Abstract: Estimation of average treatment effects under unconfoundedness or exogenous treatment assignment is often hampered by lack of overlap in the covariate distributions. This lack of overlap can lead to imprecise estimates and can make commonly used estimators sensitive to the choice of specification. In such cases researchers have often used informal methods for trimming the sample. In this paper we develop a systematic approach to addressing such lack of overlap. We characterize optimal subsamples for which the average treatment effect can be estimated most precisely, as well as optimally weighted average treatment effects. Under some conditions the optimal selection rules depend solely on the propensity score. For a wide range of distributions a good approximation to the optimal rule is provided by the simple selection rule to drop all units with estimated propensity scores outside the range [0.1, 0.9].
Number of Pages in PDF File: 49 Keywords: average treatment effects, causality, unconfoundedness, overlap, treatment effect heterogeneity JEL Classification: C14, C21, C52 working papers seriesDate posted: November 1, 2006Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.532 seconds