|
||||
|
||||
The Yardstick of Equality: Assessing contributions in Australia and England.Patrick ParkinsonUniversity of Sydney - Faculty of Law International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 163-175, 2005 Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 06/28 Abstract: Following the decision of the House of Lords in White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, the Court of Appeal in England looked to the Australian case law on special contributions to develop principles for assessing the respective contributions of the parties in big money cases. At much the same time, the Chief Justice of the Family Court of Australia invoked the reasoning in White v White as a justification for suggesting that the doctrine of special contributions should be reconsidered. To evaluate these developments, it is necessary to understand the similarities and differences between English and Australian law on property division, and the history of assessing contributions in Australia. The article concludes by evaluating the arguments for and against the notion of special contributions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 14 Keywords: Family, Property Division, Divorce, Contributions JEL Classification: K39 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: October 18, 2006Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.391 seconds