Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=938464
 
 

Footnotes (170)



 


 



Reviving Saucier: Prospective Interpretations of Criminal Laws


Ted Sampsell-Jones


William Mitchell College of Law


George Mason Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 725, 2007

Abstract:     
This article proposes a new framework for the criminal law's fair warning requirement. When adjudicating fair warning claims, courts should use the structure established by Saucier v. Katz for qualified immunity cases. In Saucier, the Supreme Court held that courts reviewing qualified immunity claims must first rule on the substantive constitutional issue, and only then proceed to the remedial ruling. The Saucier framework was intended to promote elaboration and clarification of constitutional norms while still protecting the ideal of fair warning.

Saucier offers an elegant solution for the criminal law's embattled fair warning doctrines. Importing Saucier would decouple questions of statutory interpretation from questions of notice. Importing Saucier would make the remedy for fair warning violations more commensurate with the doctrine's stated goals. Most controversially, importing Saucier would allow courts to issue rulings with prospective effect. Although these changes sound radical, the new framework is actually more moderate than the current fair warning doctrine, and the crossover application of Saucier already finds implicit support in Supreme Court doctrine. A fair warning requirement built around Saucier would be better than the fair warning requirement we have now.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: fair warning, rule of lenity, statutory interpretation, Saucier v. Katz, criminal law

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 18, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Sampsell-Jones, Ted, Reviving Saucier: Prospective Interpretations of Criminal Laws. George Mason Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 725, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=938464

Contact Information

Ted Sampsell-Jones (Contact Author)
William Mitchell College of Law ( email )
875 Summit Ave
St. Paul, MN 55105-3076
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,492
Downloads: 181
Download Rank: 96,400
Footnotes:  170

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.765 seconds