Footnotes (144)



The Efficacy of Contractual Provisions Prohibiting Assignment

Greg Tolhurst

University of Sydney - Faculty of Law

Sydney Law Review, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 161-192, 2004
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 06/38

In recent years, a line of decisions has recognised the legitimacy of prohibitions on assignment. Moreover, and despite holding that the effect of such prohibitions depends on construction, generally, it would appear that whatever words are used, the effect of a prohibition will be to render the attempted assignment ineffective. Nevertheless, it has never been fully explained how such provisions operate at a doctrinal level, that is, how a contractual provision inhibits a person dealing with their right of property. This paper suggests that the explanation lies with the ability of contracting parties to fashion the characteristics of the contractual rights they bring into existence not just in their character as contractual rights but also as choses in action.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: Assignment, Assignment of contractual rights, Prohibitions on Assignment

JEL Classification: K12

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 24, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Tolhurst, Greg, The Efficacy of Contractual Provisions Prohibiting Assignment. ; Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 06/38. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=939676

Contact Information

Greg Tolhurst (Contact Author)
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
New Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,353
Downloads: 196
Download Rank: 116,121
Footnotes:  144

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds