Francis Wharton's Orthodoxy: God, Historical Jurisprudence, and Classical Legal Thought
Stephen A. Siegel
DePaul University - College of Law
American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 46, p. 422, 2004
Francis Wharton was one of the Gilded Age's most productive legal scholars. Over a lifetime filled with accomplishment, he wrote comprehensive, well-received treatises on medical jurisprudence, criminal law and procedure, criminal and civil evidence, homicide, agency, negligence, contracts, domicile, conflict of law, and international law. He also wrote books on legal history and legal philosophy. Although Wharton's treatises are still in use, Wharton himself has fallen into obscurity.
This neglect is unfortunate because Wharton was fairly representative of an important, but little recognized, strand of nineteenth-century classical legal thought. Based upon studies of Christopher Columbus Langdell, classical legal thought is believed to have posited a radical separation between law and morals. The thesis of this Article is that Wharton's jurisprudence was an intriguing mixture of classicism, evangelical Protestantism, and non-Darwinian evolutionary theory. The thesis of this article is also that in blending law and morals, Wharton was more typical of classical scholars than the more widely studied Langdell.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19
Keywords: classical legal thought, legal orthodoxy, formalism, law and religion, religion, legal history, darwinism, baconism, evolution, gilded age, jurisprudence, historical jurisprudence, LangdellAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 25, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds