Midnight in the Courtroom of Good and Evil

James Ming Chen

Michigan State University - College of Law

Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 16, 1999
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper Series

Degeneracy, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. Much of the religiously motivated political activism in the contemporary United States arises from the belief that landmark Supreme Court cases such as Roe v. Wade and Eisenstadt v. Baird not only were wrongly decided, but also underlie many of the social pathologies that afflict the country. In the spirit of The Sount of Legal Thunder: The Chaotic Consequences of Crushing Constitutional Butterflies, http://ssrn.com/abstract=939969, this essay ponders what might have been if the Supreme Court had never decided either Roe or Eisenstadt. One surprising possibility might be judicial recognition of a right to same-sex marriage.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: constitutional law, chaos theory, Roe v. Wade, Eisenstadt v. Baird, abortion, contraception, marriage, homosexuality, substantive due process, equal protection, same-sex marriage

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 25, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Chen, James Ming, Midnight in the Courtroom of Good and Evil. Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 16, 1999; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=939972

Contact Information

James Ming Chen (Contact Author)
Michigan State University - College of Law ( email )
318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 947
Downloads: 114
Download Rank: 166,075

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.469 seconds