Midnight in the Courtroom of Good and Evil
James Ming Chen
Michigan State University - College of Law
Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 16, 1999
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper Series
Degeneracy, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. Much of the religiously motivated political activism in the contemporary United States arises from the belief that landmark Supreme Court cases such as Roe v. Wade and Eisenstadt v. Baird not only were wrongly decided, but also underlie many of the social pathologies that afflict the country. In the spirit of The Sount of Legal Thunder: The Chaotic Consequences of Crushing Constitutional Butterflies, http://ssrn.com/abstract=939969, this essay ponders what might have been if the Supreme Court had never decided either Roe or Eisenstadt. One surprising possibility might be judicial recognition of a right to same-sex marriage.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6
Keywords: constitutional law, chaos theory, Roe v. Wade, Eisenstadt v. Baird, abortion, contraception, marriage, homosexuality, substantive due process, equal protection, same-sex marriageAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 25, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 1.203 seconds