Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=940309
 


 



Doomed Internationalist (Review of Francis Fukuyama, after the Neocons: America at the Crossroads)


Kenneth Anderson


American University - Washington College of Law; Stanford University - The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace; Brookings Institution - Governance Studies

June 6, 2010

Times Literary Supplement, September 2006

Abstract:     
This review of Francis Fukuyama's widely noticed repudiation of American neoconservatism appeared in the Times Literary Supplement (London). The review praises Fukuyama's sober and careful intellectual history of neoconservatism, and breaks the idea down into seven interrelated propositions. The review considers Fukuyama's argument that neoconservatives violated their own tenets in undertaking the Iraq war, particularly the neoconservative skepticism about grand social engineering projects and the neoconservative belief that these typically lead to unanticipated bad consequences. Fukuyama also argues that the Iraq war and the project of Middle East democratization miss the fundamental point about Islamist extremism, which is that it is primarily a phenomenon of Muslims adrift in modernity in the West, particularly Western Europe, rather than the Middle East. The review accepts much of this critique but uses it to offer a critique of Western multiculturalism, arguing instead for a re-embrace of traditional liberalism - a substantive liberalism that embraces free expression, the rights of women, and values that multiculturalism suppresses. While accepting that the book is persuasive on a neoconservative naivete concerning Iraq and what force can do, it argues that there is a much more sophisticated neoconservatism in the form of realists who came to realize that the acceptance of corrupt, brutal, and repressive authoritarian regimes in the name of stability, accommodation, and containment had paved the way for much of the current Islamist extremism, and that the old realism could no longer serve. This not-naive realism-into-idealism is not really addressed by Fukuyama's critique. In any case, Fukuyama's positive program - a vague multilateralism, what he calls realistic Wilsonianism appears to be simply the traditional liberal internationalism with somewhat less emphasis on the UN; it does not appear to be capable of anything other than ineffectuality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: Fukuyama, Iraq war, multiculturalism, Islam, Islamism, jihad, terror, terrorism, neoconservative, neoconservatism, foreign policy, realism, idealism, realistic Wilsonianism, development, political Islam, End of History

JEL Classification: K10, K33

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 26, 2006 ; Last revised: July 6, 2010

Suggested Citation

Anderson, Kenneth, Doomed Internationalist (Review of Francis Fukuyama, after the Neocons: America at the Crossroads) (June 6, 2010). Times Literary Supplement, September 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=940309

Contact Information

Kenneth Anderson (Contact Author)
American University - Washington College of Law ( email )
4801 Massachusetts Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20016
United States
Stanford University - The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace
Stanford, CA 94305-6010
United States
Brookings Institution - Governance Studies
1775 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20036
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,948
Downloads: 145
Download Rank: 81,811

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.344 seconds