Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=940392
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (79)



 


 



Can Direct Democracy Be Made Deliberative?


Ethan J. Leib


Fordham University School of Law


Buffalo Law Review, Vol. 54, 2006

Abstract:     
Every election cycle a great number of citizens take to the polls to vote on public policy matters directly. Direct democracy has problems. And an account of deliberative democracy — far from being a source to critique direct democracy — might provide a solution.

I have three goals in this short Essay. First, I hope to identify some problems with the mechanisms of direct democracy that most states and many cities throughout the country employ: the initiative and the referendum. Next, I will offer a potential solution to these institutional problems using aspects of the theory of deliberative democracy, a theory often marshaled to undermine direct democracy. Finally, I will spell out why this design project should be of especial interest to lawyers.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 26, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Leib, Ethan J., Can Direct Democracy Be Made Deliberative?. Buffalo Law Review, Vol. 54, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=940392

Contact Information

Ethan J. Leib (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,979
Downloads: 733
Download Rank: 17,653
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  79

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.610 seconds