Citations (4)


Footnotes (31)



Synthetic Biology: Caught between Property Rights, the Public Domain, and the Commons

Arti K. Rai

Duke University School of Law; Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship Initiative

James Boyle

Duke University School of Law

PLoS Biology, Forthcoming
Duke Science, Technology & Innovation Paper No. 12

Synthetic biologists aim to make biology a true engineering discipline. In the same way that electrical engineers rely on standard capacitors and resistors, or computer programmers rely on modular blocks of code, synthetic biologists wish to create an array of modular biological parts that can be readily synthesized and mixed together in different combinations. Synthetic biology has already produced important results, including more accurate AIDS tests and the possibility of unlimited supplies of previously scarce drugs for malaria. Proponents hope to use synthetic organisms to produce not only medically relevant chemicals but also a large variety of industrial materials, including ecologically friendly biofuels such as hydrogen and ethanol. The relationship of synthetic biology to intellectual property law has, however, been largely unexplored. Two key issues deserve further attention. First, synthetic biology, which operates at the confluence of biotechnology and computation, presents a particularly revealing example of a difficulty that the law has frequently faced over the last 30 years - the assimilation of a new technology into the conceptual limits around existing intellectual property rights, with possible damage to both in the process. There is reason to fear that tendencies in the way that the law has handled software on the one hand and biotechnology on the other could come together in a "perfect storm" that will impede the potential of the technology. Second, synthetic biology raises with remarkable clarity an issue that has seemed of only theoretical interest until now. It points out a tension between different methods of creating "openness". On the one hand, we have intellectual property law's insistence that certain types of material remain in the public domain, outside the world of property. On the other, we have the attempt by individuals to use intellectual property rights to create a "commons," just as developers of free and open source software use the leverage of software copyrights to impose requirements of openness on future programmers, requirements greater than those attaching to a public domain work.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 8, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Rai, Arti K. and Boyle, James, Synthetic Biology: Caught between Property Rights, the Public Domain, and the Commons. PLoS Biology, Forthcoming; Duke Science, Technology & Innovation Paper No. 12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=941732

Contact Information

Arti Kaur Rai (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States

Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship Initiative ( email )
215 Morris St., Suite 300
Durham, NC 27701
United States

James Boyle
Duke University School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-7287 (Phone)
919-613-7231 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,320
Downloads: 455
Download Rank: 45,283
Citations:  4
Footnotes:  31

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.235 seconds