Postmodern Legal Thought and Cognitive Science
Edwin S. Fruehwald
Georgia State University Law Review, Forthcoming
Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research
The article criticizes postmodern legal thought using insights of cognitive science. The insights that cognitive science can bring to jurisprudence is the next frontier for legal philosophy. As Professor John Monahan has stated, "the question I want to raise is whether evolutionary psychology [a branch of cognitive science] . . . could play the same central role in legal scholarship for the next thirty years that economics has played for the past thirty." John Monahan, Symposium: Violence in the Family: Could "Law and Evolution" Be the Next "Law and Economics‘" 8 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 123 (2000).
Part II of the paper examines postmodern legal thought. Part III then introduces basic concepts of cognitive science, and Part IV demonstrates how insights of cognitive science weaken the foundations of postmodern legal thought. Part V shows the existence of universals in the human mind, which destroys the strong moral relativism underlying postmodernism. Finally, Part VI presents an alternative to postmodernism's radical political theories, based on cognitive science.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 57
Keywords: jurisprudence, cognitive science, postmodernismAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 7, 2006 ; Last revised: January 11, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.344 seconds