Is an Advertisement an Offer? Why it is, and Why it Matters
Jay M. Feinman
Rutgers Law School
Stephen R. Brill
Fox Rothschild LLP
Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 58, p. 61, 2006
Courts and scholars uniformly recite the contract law rule familiar to all first-year students: An advertisement is not an offer. The courts and scholars are wrong. An advertisement is an offer. This article explains why the purported rule is not the law, why the actual rule is that an advertisement is an offer, and what this issue tells us about contract law in particular and legal doctrine in general.
As the article describes, virtually all of the case law fails to support the purported rule, the rule is inconsistent with national and state unfair trade practices and consumer protection statutes, and the rule is unsupported by fundamental contract law principles. The article then considers alternative rules and explains why the preferred rule is that an advertisement is an offer. It concludes by broadening the inquiry and considering the role of the traditional rule and the proposed alternative rule as expressions of legal ideology.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Keywords: contract, contract law, advertisement, advertising, offer,consumer law, consumet protection, bait and switch
JEL Classification: D18, M37, K12, K29
Date posted: November 9, 2006
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.828 seconds