Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=943369
 
 

Citations (4)



 
 

Footnotes (84)



 


 



Should We Have Lay Justices?


Adrian Vermeule


Harvard Law School

November 2006

Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 134

Abstract:     
By "lay justices" I mean justices of the Supreme Court of the United States who are not accredited lawyers. Currently the number of lay justices is zero, although there is no constitutional or statutory rule that requires this. Commentators who urge that the Supreme Court should be diverse on all sorts of margins - methodological diversity, ideological diversity, and racial or ethnic or gender diversity - say little or nothing about professional diversity on the Court. I argue that the optimal number of lay justices is greater than zero. In the strong form of the argument, an historian, economist, doctor, accountant, soldier or some other nonlawyer professional should be appointed to the Court. In a weaker form of the argument, we should at least appoint dual-competent justices - lawyers who also have a degree or some other real expertise in another body of knowledge or skill.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 8, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Vermeule, Adrian, Should We Have Lay Justices? (November 2006). Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 134. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=943369 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.943369

Contact Information

Adrian Vermeule (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1525 Massachusetts
Griswold 500
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,801
Downloads: 268
Download Rank: 65,265
Citations:  4
Footnotes:  84

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.437 seconds