Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=943453
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed


David G. Post


Temple University School of Law


Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2, p. 521, Spring 1998

Abstract:     
Settlement of the New World called for a fundamental re-examination of the nature of sovereignty and statehood. Reconciling the paradoxical notion that the state is somehow both an agent of the people, and a sovereign possessing final and unappealable power, was a central pre-occupation of political thought of the 17th and 18th centuries. This paradox was resolved by the radical English Whig theorists (and their equally radical republican counterparts in the Americas) by the development of a new theory of sovereignty, one that relocated the locus of truly sovereign power away from the legislative assembly C away, indeed, from all governmental institutions C to the people. The state's power, in this view, is entirely derivative -- the very opposite of 'sovereign' -- flowing ultimately from the 'consent of the governed' who, possessing sovereign but delegable power, constitute the state as their agent for the purpose of engaging in collective action conducive to their pursuit of happiness.


This normative view of states as constituted agents whose power derives from the people's collective will and their ultimately indivisible sovereignty -- a view that has come to be labeled the 'Liberal' theory of statehood --is an a-territorial one insofar as it discards notions of physical territoriality and physical power as the bases for the exercise of sovereign power. And, as such, it appears well suited to an increasingly a-territorial, networked world. The settlement of the new domain of cyberspace may enable us to take more seriously than ever before the possibility that individuals in the ordinary course of their affairs can create governmental entities that lack territorial status, a-territorial consensual associations with no geographical referents whatsoever onto which a portion of their 'sovereignty' devolves. This paper explores some of the implications this may have for evolving normative theories of statehood and for related questions of the extraterritorial assertion of jurisdiction by existing territorial states.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: internet, governance, sovereignty, jurisdiction

JEL Classification: K10, K42

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 9, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Post, David G., The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2, p. 521, Spring 1998. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=943453

Contact Information

David G. Post (Contact Author)
Temple University School of Law ( email )
1719 N. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States
215-204-4539 or (202)364-5010 (Phone)
215-204-1185 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,209
Downloads: 280
Download Rank: 62,839
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.312 seconds