Abstract

  
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Issues and Outcomes, Guidance and Indeterminacy: A reply to Professor John Rogers and Others


David G. Post


Temple University School of Law

Steven C. Salop


Georgetown University Law Center

Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 49, 1996

Abstract:     
In this paper, we reply to criticisms raised by Prof. John Rogers, Lewis Kornhauser, Lawrence Sager, and Maxwell Stearns in connection with the proposal we advanced in an earlier publication (see 80 Geo. L.J. 743 (1992)) regarding the proper method of cumulating votes of individual members of multi-judge panels.

Keywords: judicial voting, multi-member courts, Condorcet Paradox

JEL Classification: K41, K10

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 11, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Post, David G. and Salop, Steven C., Issues and Outcomes, Guidance and Indeterminacy: A reply to Professor John Rogers and Others. Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 49, 1996. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=943515

Contact Information

David G. Post (Contact Author)
Temple University School of Law ( email )
1719 N. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States
215-204-4539 or (202)364-5010 (Phone)
215-204-1185 (Fax)
Steven C. Salop
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-662-9095 (Phone)
202-662-9497 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 157
Downloads: 15
Citations:  2

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds