Issues and Outcomes, Guidance and Indeterminacy: A reply to Professor John Rogers and Others
David G. Post
Temple University School of Law
Steven C. Salop
Georgetown University Law Center
Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 49, 1996
In this paper, we reply to criticisms raised by Prof. John Rogers, Lewis Kornhauser, Lawrence Sager, and Maxwell Stearns in connection with the proposal we advanced in an earlier publication (see 80 Geo. L.J. 743 (1992)) regarding the proper method of cumulating votes of individual members of multi-judge panels.
Keywords: judicial voting, multi-member courts, Condorcet Paradox
JEL Classification: K41, K10Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 11, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds