Issues and Outcomes, Guidance and Indeterminacy: A reply to Professor John Rogers and Others
David G. Post
OTI/New America Foundation
Steven C. Salop
Georgetown University Law Center
Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 49, 1996
In this paper, we reply to criticisms raised by Prof. John Rogers, Lewis Kornhauser, Lawrence Sager, and Maxwell Stearns in connection with the proposal we advanced in an earlier publication (see 80 Geo. L.J. 743 (1992)) regarding the proper method of cumulating votes of individual members of multi-judge panels.
Keywords: judicial voting, multi-member courts, Condorcet Paradox
JEL Classification: K41, K10
Date posted: November 11, 2006
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds