|
||||
|
||||
Ownership Structure and Target ReturnsScott W. BauguessUS Securities & Exchange Commission Sara B. MoellerUniversity of Pittsburgh - Finance Group Frederik P. SchlingemannUniversity of Pittsburgh - Finance Group; Rotterdam School of Management (Erasmus University) Chad J. ZutterUniversity of Pittsburgh - Finance Group December 1, 2007 Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2009 Abstract: Contrary to past literature, active ownership, defined as all officers and directors of the target firm, has no association with target returns. Rather, we find that inside (managerial) ownership has a positive relation with target returns, whereas active-outside (non-managing director) ownership has a negative relation with target returns. The relation between inside ownership and target returns is best explained by takeover anticipation, whereas the relation between outside ownership and target returns is best explained by outsiders' willingness to share gains with the bidder. While the relation between target returns and ownership measures is generally more pronounced for non-tender deals, it is more pronounced for tender offers between active corporate ownership and target returns.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 47 Keywords: target returns, ownerhsip, acquisition, firm value JEL Classification: G31, G32, G34 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: November 12, 2006 ; Last revised: November 19, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.359 seconds