Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=945178
 
 

Footnotes (83)



 


 



Antitrust Analysis of Category Management: Conwood v. United States Tobacco Co.


Joshua D. Wright


Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University

November 10, 2006

Supreme Court Economic Review, Forthcoming
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 06-38

Abstract:     
Category management refers generally to the process by which retailers select products to stock, display, promote, advertise, and price within a product category. Category management contracts involve a retailer designating a particular manufacturer as the “category captain”, who has influence over which products in a product category are stocked, as well as how they are displayed, promoted, and priced. Category management contracts have attracted antitrust scrutiny in recent years, exemplified by the Sixth Circuit’s recent decision in Conwood Co. v. United States Tobacco Co., which held that United States Tobacco’s abuse of its position as category captain, exclusionary arrangements, misleading statements and destruction of rivals’ products violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act. Conwood is an especially important candidate for detailed economic and legal analysis for two reasons. The first is that antitrust commentators have almost universally agreed that Conwood is an example of “cheap exclusion” or more generally, a monopolization enforcement action that belongs to an identifiable category of cases involving significant threats to competitive harm without plausible efficiency justifications. The second reason is that Conwood can be viewed as part of a broader trend toward increased scrutiny of distribution contracts that explicitly or implicitly restrict the display, promotion, or sale of rival products by retailers.

Our analysis of the facts in Conwood challenges the conventional wisdom that it is an example of “cheap exclusion” and concludes that competitive harm was unlikely. Further, we provide a pro- competitive justification for category management contracts delegating shelf space decisions to the manufacturer as a form of partial exclusive dealing contract which grant a manufacturer access to preferred shelf space but do not completely exclude rivals.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: category management, exclusive dealing, vertical restraints, slotting allowances, antitrust

JEL Classification: L42, D23


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 19, 2005 ; Last revised: July 12, 2009

Suggested Citation

Wright, Joshua D., Antitrust Analysis of Category Management: Conwood v. United States Tobacco Co. (November 10, 2006). Supreme Court Economic Review, Forthcoming; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 06-38. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=945178 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.704181

Contact Information

Joshua D. Wright (Contact Author)
Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University Logo

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 6,397
Downloads: 986
Download Rank: 15,317
Footnotes:  83

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.500 seconds